InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 74
Posts 2014
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/05/2003

Re: Delroy post# 59128

Monday, 07/27/2015 10:04:11 AM

Monday, July 27, 2015 10:04:11 AM

Post# of 68424
Delroy: Actually, I believe your statement is semi correct. VRNG appealed several errors of the trial court, including the devastating laches decision. As I recall, Google also appealed several issues including running royalties. Unless I am corrected, the CAFC did not reach these issues when it threw VRNG out on obviousness. Therefore, while the Supremes may reverse and render on obviousness, I believe the CAFC will have to go back into the case and deal with the remaining issues. Should they then reverse the laches ruling, we may get a further remand for retrial of past damages.

IMO

ghors