Interesting scenarios. Not being an attorney, I am not sure of the answers, but I will make a guess. I doubt that being in a JV with a Canadian-traded company would change anything. The company itself is still not Canadian traded.
As for your second scenario, I believe that the BCSC would review a technical document issued and in fact, would require submittal of documents. However, they would not be considered "43-101 compliant" until they are reviewed and approved.
As for your third option, it appears that USPR does not think that the BCSC or the SEC cares if US-traded companies fraudulently issue "43-101" reports. Ironically, several SEC-filers have very recently come under the scrutiny of the SEC because of their "43-101" reports:
This is what the SEC asked LBSR, regarding their "43-101" reports:
Is USPR next? They should be. Especially if they have the cojones to issue another report, and make the mistake of fraudulently labeling it as a 43-101 (again).
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.