Sunday, July 19, 2015 7:57:20 PM
Geo was required by the judge to reimburse Bob et al as the judges decision notes-but to my knowledge Geo has not done that
i think it was earlier reported the jury found both parties violated their fiduciary duty under the jv and thus the jury awarded nothing for that
if that was part of the subject matter jurisdiction of the tx case then geo cannot proceed further re such a claim- time period to appeal tx is over
if it wasnt part of the subject matter -but i think it was because the jury previously reportedly found as noted above- then geo would have to pursue such an action separately- which would be dangerous on geos part because i believe the jury already decided geo violated its fiduciary duty and to my knowledge geo hasnt paid cwrn for its over 100k texas att fees as required
Imo. Do your dd before investing. I'm not a financial adviser nor compensated for my posts. They don't believe what they say, so why should you?
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM
Dear Cashmere Group Holding Co. AKA Swifty Global Signs Binding Letter of Intent to be Acquired by Signing Day Sports • DRCR • Sep 19, 2024 10:26 AM
HealthLynked Launches Virtual Urgent Care Through Partnership with Lyric Health. • HLYK • Sep 19, 2024 8:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • ELMGF • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM