Cotton & Western Mining Inc. (CWRN)

[microcaps1]

whether Bob et al were present i dont know but bobs attorney argued as the judge notes and bob et al's presence probably was not required -depo's had already been taken

Geo was required by the judge to reimburse Bob et al as the judges decision notes-but to my knowledge Geo has not done that

i think it was earlier reported the jury found both parties violated their fiduciary duty under the jv and thus the jury awarded nothing for that

if that was part of the subject matter jurisdiction of the tx case then geo cannot proceed further re such a claim- time period to appeal tx is over

if it wasnt part of the subject matter -but i think it was because the jury previously reportedly found as noted above- then geo would have to pursue such an action separately- which would be dangerous on geos part because i believe the jury already decided geo violated its fiduciary duty and to my knowledge geo hasnt paid cwrn for its over 100k texas att fees as required