E.I.,
I was not able to log in on time in order to hear the results of this sham U.S.S.R. style vote.
Do you (or does anybody else on this Board) happen to have the Final Tally?
I am trying to get a sense for how many people voted AGAINST the Plan, given that Goldman Sucks, et al. stated that they needed no more than 7.5% of the shares voting AGAINST the Plan.
Even though passage of the deal was a done deal, I believe that they required a "majority of the minority" type vote where they were looking to get 50.1% of the shares not affiliated with the insider trading subsidiaries of G.S. that were acting in concert to circumvent the terms of each series of preferred shares (e.g., no purchases by the company while the dividend is in arrears in order to prevent suspension of the dividend and then allow the company to buy up as many shares on the cheap).
My other theory is that they used the phrase/term "dissenting shareholders." I am wondering if they require that no more than 7.5% of the non-affiliated shares may dissent and request "fair payment" after a suit against W2007 has been initiated.
Again, I'm flying a little blind on this one.
Any assistance/help on any of the issues presented above would be greatly appreciated.
"Thank you, Spanky-san, for giving Ling-Ling honor in paper hat form!"
