InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 74
Posts 7117
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/31/2010

Re: None

Saturday, 07/04/2015 8:37:01 AM

Saturday, July 04, 2015 8:37:01 AM

Post# of 91121
nobody but bashers have ever said there were deductions for deleterious materials-the geological reports posted by CWRN never showed high amounts of such- only vendetta bashers have claimed such

the reason why cwrns ore would be valuable for such purposes is because cwrn has low amounts of bad stuff- rocket and i and others posted geological reports for cwrn fert many times,

whereas, as per an official 122 page report on usa iron mining i posted -w many followup posts -usa iron ore is very high -49-90% plus in deleterious materials which makes usa iron unsuitable for organic fert

the azomite iron fert produced in utah-the only usa organic fert of substantial amount i know of - is sold for a high price and is reportedly less valuable/less good minerals than cwrns fert

i and cwrn have been talking about ORGANIC fert-look up OMRI-a network of buyers, sellers and processors of certified organic fert CWRN was in talks with in 2011 -2012

cwrn ore has a lot of other minerals in it which make it valuable
as an organic fert that usa iron does not have and/or in the alternative as noted by the official reports usa iron has huge amounts of bad material which have to be removed via floatation and other methods of beneficiation- thus ca 98% of usa iron produced as iron had to use beneficiation!!!!

organic vs in organic fert is analogous to the difference between processed white bread -which essentially has all the valuable ingredients /nutrition removed by processors -then they add a tiny amount back and falsely call it 'enriched' -doublespeak.

I began gardening when i was 4 and was always an organic gardener-and people were amazed at what i grew just as 1 of many hobbies- that organic market is rapidly qrowing- people who have an understanding of complex soil chemistry dont want the ''enriched'' but otherwise nutrient poor white bread petro substitutes that are so poor they have to be repeatedly applied over and over in ignorance of other soil requirements

i havent had time to organic garden for 25 years but the trees etc growing out of what i did organic garden ages ago are still going strong on that over 25 year old organic material without the need for cheap non-organic substitutes;

when the white man came to the new continent there was reportedly an average of 5 feet of organic material and now there is only ca 7 inches hybrid substitute; due to extremely poor post WW2 ignorant, shortsighted non-organic commercial profit at any price farming practices

so now there is a dire need to use organic practices esp with usual high petro prices-e.g, gas was only 33c /gallon before 1973-
because almost all the organic material has been used/destroyed for short term gain

and food cannot be grown without humus except for hydroponics which gets humus substitutes

that dark organic soil layer is what grows the food -thats where the organic nutrients are - petro subs delete that-organic ferts enhance that-
without organic soils we would never have been here-life or death-billions of years of organic bio-deposits destroyed in only 50 years
-so choose to be ignorant and continue choosing death ad infinitum or choose life for once




Imo. Do your dd before investing. I'm not a financial adviser nor compensated for my posts. They don't believe what they say, so why should you?