I have posted and discussed the requirements on this board several times. If you have all the answers feel free to post them, instead of just insulting people. I will learn from anyone, even rude sorts like yourself (as long as you have something to teach). Yet your only post is devoid of content.
I read the writing on the wall and I thought lode from $2 to .50 cents was an easy short (which I did not participate in). At this point going long .50 to a buck or $1.50 is probably possible and even likely except for the delisting cloud. Why wouldn't lode get out in front of it like MUX? What's the secret PRO? Why do you defend them? Why not share your PRO skills and outline for this fool why lode is the only stock on the exchange that doesn't have to meet its original listing requirements or even mention it to holders. I posted around 5 links about this topic to your zero. Please shower us with your knowledge and set the issue to rest for fools like me.
My point was only that lode is coming up on its 6 months and we have never been informed of anything, let alone the exact notice they received. Other companies instantly report it as soon as they have the info, but lode has reported not a peep. Defending this shows just how biased you are. Rational shareholders want clarification. Honest communication may mean nothing to you but is important to me, regardless of what company it is or whether I own one share or a million.
Even if I did own no shares at all my decade of experience with this stock should make my opinion worth something, even if you don't believe it or take it with a grain of salt. I couldn't care less what other people do or say about their lode stock, but they should at least try and keep their posts honest (IMO). Many posts here are factually incorrect but I don't have the time or interest to prove them all wrong -- especially when I have so little at stake.
As I have mentioned before I still own a small number of lode shares, having sold most for a slight loss at substantially higher prices. If anyone listened they would have saved 75% of their capital and could now repurchase near a likely cyclical bottom if that is their desire, or buy any other of the countless good deals out there.
I am completely agnostic when it comes to lode, whereas most people on this board are married to the stock and defend it no matter what happens or how poorly it performs.
I find the hypocrisy of your comments to be amusing, since you come off like an enormous know-it-all yourself. You even have "pro" in your name. I think you're doing some projecting and should take some of your own advice.
I have never presented myself as an expert because I am not one. It will take me another ten to twenty years of study before I would consider myself an expert, but I will get there one day. I started investing when I was eight years old and will continue to learn and invest until the day I die regardless of what anonymous posters say. I have read hundreds of investing books and learned lots through hard knocks and experience and I share this information freely because many people encourage me to do so. If you do not like what I have to say there is a feature called "ignore," which you are welcome to use and stick your head in the sand.
