Quote
Heck, a month ago, FSNR was a shell.
So Fsnr was a shell.
Quote
About the future. Lets look at it, FSNR is NOT a shell.
It owns a business that is revenue producing.
True, going from a shell to a functional company, if it is, is great!
Quote:
I am waiting for revenue projections, and actual updates about how much Petrozene once in production a machine can do.
Sounds good, but there hasn't been any sales of petrozene?
Quote
Then I want to know who is buying the product?
No one as the last 10Q stated.
If Petrozene is as big as some have hyped it up.
Sir, that's all it's been is hype, no company proof.
Quote
If this technology really is as big as some posters talk about it being.
Sir, if it is, how come oil and gas companies don't invest?
How come petrozene hasn't proved itself over the years?
Personal DD should always be the guide.
Fsnr has had a list of failures and vague prs with no results.
Even this contract is vague.
This is the best looking Fsnr has been since hydrex, 5 years ago.
It fell through because of a stipulation.
Now we read pros who hype unproven results and the cons who show possible scams.
So, I know no rear view mirror, but, it's all Fsnr has as a record.
Best to you also.
