InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 1354
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/11/2014

Re: jimtash post# 29438

Wednesday, 07/01/2015 1:22:26 AM

Wednesday, July 01, 2015 1:22:26 AM

Post# of 30046
sure, why not . . .

it's so easy to lie . . . no, but it's a foregone conclusion being that the NAME IS AVAILABLE . . . the name of the voided cusip is ABANDONED . . . yes, they can do a name change upon revival, but at this point ADI is a sub of NOTHING . . .

i'm just here for the debate, and i wouldn't waste a penny for info . . . if a shareholder was seriously thinking this is still alive, then they should pay for the info on ADI . . . that's the entity that would go forward . . . a private company, no shareholders, no debt . . . as soon as you attach the radient legacy, the shareholders and debt get reattached . . .

this is why i call ADI spun off . . . your CEO transfered your IP to the sub and walked out the door . . . sad, but true . . .

and while i'm at it . . . can we please drop provista from the loop? . . . it's a lot of wasted space . . . a 5 year old LOI between EX CEOs is outdated garbage . . . provista has a paper in ASCO '15, no DR-70, they have a website, no DR-70, and they show a robust pipeline, no DR-70 . . .

and radient has NO SHELL . . . sorry for rambling

i'm trying to pick the pocket of the big guys, while they're too busy robbing the bank to notice . . . long only . . .

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.