InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 211
Posts 22584
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 05/19/2010

Re: onthegreen post# 99545

Tuesday, 06/30/2015 4:54:41 PM

Tuesday, June 30, 2015 4:54:41 PM

Post# of 115852
It most certainly does not. In business, there is no room for an emotion like "it sends the wrong message." Black & White!! Let's go!! The damage is done and it WAS NOT done on Jorge's dime. What would send a somewhat "wrong message" would be a (new) ceo (like Saenz) saying, "well let me just wipe the slate clean and do a 1 for 1,000." That would be something that is quite typical actually! With a small split (and boy are you gonna get one of some kind regardless), existing shareholders do not suffer big losses, IF ANY AT ALL !!

PS, there are 117 investors in PRPM because they were not smart enough to avoid buying after the 1 year DTCC global lock expired. There were 2 options that day: dump or wait, not buy more.

Jorge, we need a hair cut for this PRPM microcap hippy over in Aisle .0001.

it sends the wrong message is all I'm saying.

If you want more of Looter & Eddie/ Global Locks & Reverse Splits and Massive Dilution....that's what you do....it allows other investors to see that nothing has changed.

Maybe there is a reason there are only 117 Investors here....and I don't think it's because everyone else is waiting for them to do a R/S