Cyclone knows their forward-looking "Safe Harbor" disclaimers are bogus.
When they filed for registration with the SEC in 2011, they admitted (page 15):
Even so, page 1 of this document started with a forward looking statement disclaimer.
Every one of their press releases includes the disclaimer.
Every one of their SEC filings includes the disclaimer.
So what do you call someone who pretends they are protected by the Safe Harbor provision in every document they put out, all the while knowing it doesn't apply to them?
Then what do you call them when they repeatedly predict production of engines will soon begin when they know they don't have an engine design that will work 50 hours without breaking down? And then hide behind the Safe Harbor provision while they make new predictions that they also know will never come true.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.