InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 113
Posts 16407
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/22/2011

Re: gorgol post# 70436

Friday, 05/29/2015 1:54:01 PM

Friday, May 29, 2015 1:54:01 PM

Post# of 232593
I am not disappointed with the PPS. It is a stark reflection of reality: Management has demonstrated an increasing cash burn rate and dilution instead of performance with revenues and profits.
Why should the PPS reflect anything else? Disappointment with a PPS accomplishes nothing.

Whether management disappears or not, it is clear they are not left holding the bag, but indeed, as you suggested, you are.

Why would management choose to borrow more money when they can get it free from shareholders. Please explain your logic.

Outside shareholders are not able to receive stock grants and options. Insiders can. So no matter what the dilution, they will be sitting just fine, and unlike you shareholders, will not be holding the bag.

I do not understand why you keep talking about the TITANIC. According to Steipp, the TITANIC already sank prior to August 5, 2010, and the only survivors were the Kang hang-overs (Kangovers, for short). They have been retained by Steipp along with the new hires to join the new Liquidmetal team.

So if you want to refer to the new and improved version of the Liquidmetal ship, please do not call it the old TITANTIC.

Just call it TITANIC II.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News