InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 123
Posts 3857
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/19/2002

Re: gibson256 post# 18629

Thursday, 05/28/2015 11:10:56 AM

Thursday, May 28, 2015 11:10:56 AM

Post# of 46306
Sorry, but that does not apply.

Worlds (WDDD) filed the lawsuit in March 2012. The possibility of 3rd party IPRs was not even known at that time.

The inter partes review process was enacted on September 16, 2012. Nobody knew for years what the impact would be or what loopholes in the AIA law would be exploited and to what degree. It has taken a long time for this headache (the IPR process) to manifest itself and in no way could SG or anyone else predicted that 3rd parties (that are not real parties-in-interest to an existing lawsuit) would game the system and circumvent the one-year petition deadline.

Much has been written on IPRs, publicly traded investments, and the backlash created by the AIA (and the need for immediate reform at the legislative level). I suggest all interested in WDDD take the time to do the research.

SG spent 90 days studying this case before they accepted. The prior art argument has been played ad nauseam and WDDD patents have passed the test.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent WDDD News