InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 182
Posts 50711
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 12/20/2004

Re: DavidRFoley99 post# 308394

Monday, 05/25/2015 12:23:05 PM

Monday, May 25, 2015 12:23:05 PM

Post# of 380511

I've never once asked anyone here or any other forum, or social media outlet to buy shares in NTEK

Well, d'oh, that's what 3rd party promoters like BB and others active here are for. Since this is an open forum unlike that other mess, and since you spend effort defending yourself instead of correcting the obvious lies and false info published by your 3rd party and people on this board, perhaps you'd like a chance to defend yourself concerning this comment?

Due to all the public records available on pacer that contradicts almost 90% of what you personally posted on Ihub about legal, would you not agree that your public posting has basically destroyed your personal credibility and most likely permanently damaged your company ntek's credibility as well? Would you agree now that posting in any capacity publicy on Ihub or other chat boards was a very bad decision?

Quote:DavidRFoley99
Friday, 06/20/14 01:55:05 PM
Re: nuubie post# 203582

Post # 203746 of 308092


Wrong again.

Quote:

No factual errors here, right? Straight from the US Department Of Justice's mouth...

You have a lot to learn if you think the US Department of Justice doesn't put out factual errors in press releases to help promote themselves and bolster their story.

Quote:

The charges were contained in separate indictments

Wrong, charges were originally contained in a single indictment. They then split it into two cases to cause me to defend two cases in parallel.

Quote:

Foley illegally produced the products

The production of these game packs was not illegal. We proved that I had the legal right to manufacture them in court.

Quote:

Global VR, which had previously acquired all rights to produce and sell games under the UltraCade name


Wrong. Global VR only acquired a non-exclusive contract to produce games under the UltraCade name. The contracts were entered as part of the evidence chain, and the owner of game pack IP testified that he never gave Global VR exclusive rights to it. Further to this point, Global VR continued to pay me and others royalties on game pack sales that they made because they did not have the exclusive rights, and only had non-exclusive licenses from us.

Quote:

d from his job by the time the loan applications were submitted.

False. My loan applications were submitted while I was at Global VR, and my loan was approved, and issued while I was still at Global VR. My loan had already been issued before I was fired from Global VR. I closed escrow after I was fired from Global VR.

I admitted what I did wrong, and that is in the court records which are public. I disagree, and always have, with the twisting of the story by sources other than the court records.