Thursday, May 21, 2015 6:09:37 PM
I don't think it is necessary to replace Dan. I think it is necessary to have someone help him. Remember, Dan is not doing this because he is super qualified. Dan is doing this because NOBODY ELSE was. He rightly knew that someone had to put a boot in Scotts ass or we were going nowhere.
Its interesting that you use the term "the right name". Scott has the right name, he just happens to be a dud. I don't know the movers and shakers of the mining industry so I would not recognize "the name" of a qualified CEO.
I would be impressed with rapid positive progress. Whoever can get that done has my vote.
Does that answer your question?
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM