InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 3495
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/15/2010

Re: ReelTimer post# 36612

Friday, 05/15/2015 6:20:19 PM

Friday, May 15, 2015 6:20:19 PM

Post# of 45244
The people here and entitled to hear the facts and do their independent research. Anyone who does it can tell you that BCCI, back then known as ICTN, went public in 2000 at $6 per share and that it had a reverse split in 2010 of 1 for 20, meaning that it was once a $120 stock. Then, the reverse left the original stockholders with 1/20th of the shares outstanding, and later the shares outstanding were increased by more than 50%.

They are also entitled to know that the company went through several business model. It was first a long-distance service provided at which it made no money. Then it became a software developer that had its only patent rejected, which he then sold to RLTR for 30 million shares, as Henthorn controlled both companies. The BCCI change the business model to one of being a service provider to internet based business, and it only had one customer, RLTR. Then, in 2010, he reorganized the company into BCCI and now appears to be in the process of changing the business model completely, but along the way there was the ice phase and the reality TV show phase, and at all of this it has never made money. However, investors have sunk tens of millions into this and his other publicly traded companies.

Facts are facts. Anyone can look this up if they want to take the time. You, on the other hand. are always claiming, and have for many years, that a bonanza is around the corner. Unfortunately for the stockholders, it never arrives.

And who would you rather believe, an unhappy stockholders because he was cheated or a fellow that will gain by selling is free or cheap shares gotten directly from the company who will profit handsomely if he can help the stock run? And would anybody believe your claim that an unhappy stockholder would rather the situation continue as it is than see the shares go up in value?
The picture you paint makes no sense. A person would have to be naïve to fall for it.