InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 2526
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/12/2001

Re: Schneidku40 post# 37369

Tuesday, 05/05/2015 9:29:13 PM

Tuesday, May 05, 2015 9:29:13 PM

Post# of 53702
Seriously? Cubic being compared with pink sheet Virtra???

Cubic continues to be a respected real company with solid revenues year after year without constant excuses about revenue cycles and other crap. And, er, aaaahhhhh, Virtra's near record annual revenue is probably less then Cubic spends for employee paid time off annually and bottled water.

So Johnny's lemonade stand down the street had big gains in revenue last year and Kroeger saw a slight decline in their lemonaid revenue... Yep, gotta go with go with Johnny and his $40, up from $35, rather then risk investing with a real, multi-billion dollar company that dropped from $20 billion to only $19.9 billion a year.

Cubic and other real companies have goals and their management, directors, etc. remain accountable for their performance and the success of the company... While Virtra's management and directors remain content to just keep the lights on... as long as they can keep taking paychecks and get more options. There is no pressure on Virtra directors to improve their performance or even to perform at all. No fire under their feet, just a steady paycheck and more automatic options.

Their mission statement should read something like:

Set no goals and miss no goals, a job for life and it all pays the same. Investors?... Who needs 'em!!!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VTSI News