- Judges are human and the ultimate ruling can be quite unpredictable. What may seem logical to you may not seem be logical to the judge who's opinion is the only one that counts -- not yours. The judge could very well rule in favor of IMPHP and say that same ruling does not apply to IMPHO. There's a variable premium to that possibility which is reflected in the price of the two preferreds.
- The preferred shares pay differently. 9.125% vs 9.375%. A small 0.25% difference but a difference nonetheless. This also applies to the potential for retroactive dividends in case the ruling favors both IMPHP and IMPHO. IMPHP sharedholders will get more $$$.
Disclosure: I am long shares of both IMPHO and IMPHP as well as the common stock.
FEATURED Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Bulk Sample, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Sep 11, 2024 9:15 AM
One World Products Issues Shareholder Update Letter • OWPC • Sep 11, 2024 7:27 AM
Kona Gold Beverage Inc. Reports $1.225 Million in Revenue and $133,000 Net Profit for the Quarter • KGKG • Sep 10, 2024 1:30 PM