InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 373
Posts 16792
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 03/07/2014

Re: None

Sunday, 04/26/2015 4:26:18 PM

Sunday, April 26, 2015 4:26:18 PM

Post# of 92948
LOL quote , "If anyone takes the 98% scenerio serious, you have to ask why?"

The common shares have not lost 98% of their value? MATH LIES? Really?

ACTC/Ocata went public in 2005 (TEN years ago) via the poor man's way- using a revese merger w/ the TWO MOONS KACHINA DOLL COMPANY OF UTAH and straight to the OTC.

From there- it's lost, more than 98% of the common share value. REALITY and a FACT.

When they merged on to the OTC as a public company- the shares traded for $5 a share in 2005.

$5 a share = 500 cents. Today's price is about 7.48 cents (adjusted for the R/S done recently; one must ALWAYS adjust for forward or reverse splits when looking at any stock's long term share price rise or decline)

Thus 500 cents - today's 7.48 CENTS = 492.52 / 500 = 0.985 X 100 = 98.5% loss to common.

Yep, the common shares since going public have LOST 98.5 percent of their value as of TODAY
(Friday's closing price). Simple as that. The share pre R/S had diluted out to well over 3 BILLION shares and hit an actual 5 CENTS a share, again when the R/S is removed- which one must always do when looking at ANY company's historical stock performance.

The company has $350 MILLION in sunk capital and never so much as ONE CENT of ROI (return on investment). It's been a solid loser since day one- never once producing a return or positive cash flow and never a profit LOL, not even remotely close to that.

They've been financially distressed since going public 10 yrs ago and are financially distressed to this day- per their own Sr. Mgt and own auditor's "GOING CONCERN WARNINGS" plastered numerous, numerous places throughout their most recent filed 10-K.

Here's an article in the highly respected journal, "NATURE" that describes how they've been in financial distress and problems since essentially DAY ONE.

http://www.nature.com/news/stem-cell-research-never-say-die-1.9759

Some tid-bits from their most recent filed 10-K, aka RECENT evaluation of the current condition of the company:

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1140098/000101968715000981/ocata_10k-123114.htm

PAGE 16:

"We will require substantial additional resources to fund our operations and to develop our product candidates. If we cannot find additional capital resources, we will have difficulty in operating as a going concern and growing our business."

"Other than our arrangement with Lincoln Park, we have no sources of debt or equity capital committed for funding. Recent attempts to raise capital in the public equity markets have proven unsuccessful, and we can provide no assurance that we will be successful in any future funding effort. "

PAGE 43:

"As of December 31, 2014, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $349.1 million, recurring losses from operations, and negative working capital which raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern."

PAGE 46:

"We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Ocata Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for the year then ended and our report dated March 16, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon and included an emphasis of a matter paragraph relating to an uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

/s/ BDO USA, LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 16, 2015"

PAGE 13:

"Our ability to become profitable depends upon our ability to generate revenue. We do not anticipate generating revenues from product sales for the foreseeable future, if ever. "


Another article about the history and historical performance of ACTC/OCAT (nothing like a name change to try and run from the tainted past, eh?)

http://www.nanalyze.com/2014/04/some-problems-with-advanced-cell-technology/

QUOTE from article:

" Investors who would have purchased this stock when it began trading in 2005 would have already lost -98% of their investment."

Of course- all along as the common shares have creamed their average retail investor- the insiders have profited handsomely for years, literally becoming very wealthy in most cases. Very impressive IMO. Several have an amazing, seemingly uncanny "knack" for being able to sell/dump the free shares they receive into nearly every short term "pop" and spike in the price of the stock. Amazing sage like abilities to time the near perfect top of spike with sage like accuracy- all while the common holders languish with large losses and dead money as a raging bull market passed their dollars by.

Yes, that 98% loss to the common shares is all just a tall tale of fiction I suppose- all except for the factual MATH and reality part of it.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.