InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 117
Posts 42234
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 05/16/2011

Re: JACKSGTS post# 86525

Tuesday, 04/21/2015 1:55:11 PM

Tuesday, April 21, 2015 1:55:11 PM

Post# of 130206
Well, reading court documents is really helpful.

One of the reasons that Smokeless had problems and lost customers (I assume) is because good ol Petey didn't deliver the product.

He did take their MONEY - 90 THOUSAND DOLLARS.... Peter Michaels, DID NOT deliver the product.. so not sure how they could be at fault...but then again.. Petey is probably thinking it is all their fault since NOTHING is ever Petey's fault.

It cannot be argued that he took the 90K and didn't deliver

BUY the documents and read them very interesting reading for sure.

OR was it 89 thousand dollars.. that might be more exact..

PS Just read the complaints.. they are at the EXACT TIME that PETER MICHAELS DID NOT DELIVER the ECIGS to them...I will double check the court docs....

PETER MICHAELS PROMISED DELIVERY.. By FEB 2 2012....so good ol' Petey helped make trouble for Smokeless. Nice, Petey, really really nice.

Hey Petey doesn't only ruin his business, he ruins other people's businesses.

Are you playing stupid or is it not an act?
"Beauty fades. Dumb is forever"
"Don't spit on my cupcake and tell me it's frosting"
"Don't pee on my leg and tell me it's raining"
All said by Judge Judy