InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 41
Posts 12861
Boards Moderated 23
Alias Born 04/16/2001

Re: None

Sunday, 04/12/2015 7:10:37 PM

Sunday, April 12, 2015 7:10:37 PM

Post# of 28677
The corporate filing done in the past by Bourque Industries were done through unaudited financial reports filed through the OTC, this as a way to omit additional share disclosures or financing to shareholders. The purpose of using unaudited financial reports allowed the officers at Bourque Industries to omit certain activity, such as the details of cash and share transfers associated with the acquired BAM (Bourque Alloys Manufacturing) into Bourque Industries, that and other share giveaways the officers choose not to disclose to the shareholders.

This causes my thoughts to wonder if the accountant and lawyer listed on the OTC site that represent Bourque Industries may very well be of status inactive, not only in the present, but were in the past also, as in, they never represented Bourque Industries.

The question really is who signed the documents filed with the corporations division in their state of domicile, and even more important is why did the transfer agent not require that this information be on record with the authorities governing public companies---OTC and the SEC.

For example, does the transfer agent know he just printed 100,000,000 million special preferred shares to a man sitting in prison?

Its been suggested that the transfer agent on record in 2011 made it difficult for what is now known as the Hurting in the Dark shareholders to get their GPGI shares converted to free trading, that while John Bourque and Twiford got to slip out all their shares without competition from the other shareholders. If so, this is why the stock skyrocketed in the first place. Imagine a stock that you can only buy but not sell---the only sellers then were able to stair step it out completely. By June of 2011 competition on the sell side made the stock go down and then the serious dump in the fall of that year permanently killed it. In Feb of 2012 when all the shares came off restriction it was already too late for the Hurting in the Dark shareholders to get out, and they trapped themselves making the now known bad decision to not sell for a loss but wait for the pps to increase based on thinking John Bourque's agenda was to protect shareholders.


The posts contained on my (gotmilk) account are my own opinions and are not recommendations or advise to buy or sell any security, stocks or other investments. These posts are for entertainment purposes only and are not considered to be facts or truth.