InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 180
Posts 9202
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 05/01/2009

Re: Steady_T post# 280457

Monday, 03/30/2015 3:44:56 PM

Monday, March 30, 2015 3:44:56 PM

Post# of 312014
Good grief....and dead wrong once again.

'Judgement' is right in the documents....right there for everyone to see.....absolutely no need to read it again.....

lmfao.

The court did not render a "judgement".



JBI and Bordynuik consented to final judgments entered by the Court. The final judgment against JBI permanently enjoined the company from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) and Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B) and 13(b)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, and 13a-13 thereunder, and ordered JBI to pay a civil monetary penalty of $150,000. The final judgment against Bordynuik permanently enjoined him from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Sections 10(b) and 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5, 13a-14, 13b2-1 and 13b2-2 thereunder, and from aiding and abetting violations of Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-11, and ordered him to pay a civil penalty of $110,000. Bordynuik also was barred for five years (from March 18, 2013) from acting as an officer or director of a public company.