InvestorsHub Logo

es1

Followers 153
Posts 16535
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/13/2009

es1

Re: jfburk post# 146966

Monday, 03/30/2015 12:25:42 PM

Monday, March 30, 2015 12:25:42 PM

Post# of 165854
Well to begin with I did not say that the assets in the ground are gone did I? I simply stated that without money the assets will stay exactly where they are.

what do you think is going to happen to the lawsuit with a PEA and Metallurgy Report showing the Gulf Dominion, Colorado school of mines report, and all the PR's of the past to be accurate?



IMO if the company can produce this the PPS would increase. Obviously. But it wont do a thing to the case. The case is not about the value of SRSR the case is about if Dan misused his power as the controller of the funds.

The person who wanted their money can decide that they are happy now but that would not stop the case from moving forward.

The release of the CSM report in connection to SRSR could finally legally show the world what it says. But I don't know if that is a good or bad thing.

Now what happens to the PPS if these things are shown to be inaccurate?

What is going to happen to the PPS when Dan needs to pay back $200K plus interest and can no longer fund the PEA and drilling?

What happens when they decide that they need a trustee while the case is pending and the trustee doesn't care about the PRs and 70 year old reports and decides the best thing for the fund is to dump the 11M shares at the current PPS and take what they can get?

Thing is we don't have any idea which of these situations will or may happen.

What we do know is that the law suit has every ability to effect this stock in either direction.

It could end up being one of the best things to happen to SRSR. Or not.

But it is silly to pretend it is not going to effect it in the slightest