Quite absurd this posting about Pyrr being a "short" from the beginning.
Generally I think it's very childish and silly to make this kind of difference between pumpers and bashers, shorts and longs. Of course there are some people you can classify this way, just look at YMB and you will find many of them.
But you simply can't call someone a short or a basher, when he is just hinting at some negative points and gives his reasons for this.
When I remember it right, Pyrr always was positive about DCVax-L (and he is still), and mostly not so enthusiastic about Direct. Maybe in the meantime he had become more positive about it, but now he had changed his mind to some degree. But he also explains very well, why he is sceptical about the results, especially when compared to the other new treatments. You can share his view or you can argue against it, but he is simply not bashing or trying to manipulate anyone on this board.
About the conspiracy theory of big pharma trying to keep down NWBO, I don't know. Why aren't they fighting Juno and Kite in the same way? On the other hand, I think there have been some suspicious things happening around NWBO and the attacks by AF seemed to be orchestrated, but without any hard facts it's hard to tell, who are the bad boys behind this.
In my view it is somehow a sign of extremistic thinking, when you only differ white fromblack, good from bad, or in this case "short" from "long".
