Here are straight answers to straight questions, skeet
I'll re-state your questions, in your own words, so that I'm not accused of twisting them:
Simple answer: I don't know why Farney Daniels quit the case. I just find it strange that they would.
Settling the matter would not validate the patent. It would leave the question of validity unresolved. Settlement would only resolve the matter between the parties to that settlement.
To illustrate the point: 1. Imagine that Eyetalk365 settled. That would not validate the patent. Obviously. 2. Imagine that Alarm Force settled. That settlement agreement would not be binding on CPI.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.