InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 39
Posts 2702
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/20/2010

Re: skeet57 post# 50136

Thursday, 03/26/2015 10:13:58 AM

Thursday, March 26, 2015 10:13:58 AM

Post# of 68833
Here are straight answers to straight questions, skeet

I'll re-state your questions, in your own words, so that I'm not accused of twisting them:

after almost 1 year and all the money they invested in the case why do you think they quit the case

Simple answer: I don't know why Farney Daniels quit the case. I just find it strange that they would.

2 What do you think would be the result if one of these decide to settle would that validate the patient

Settling the matter would not validate the patent. It would leave the question of validity unresolved.
Settlement would only resolve the matter between the parties to that settlement.

To illustrate the point:
1. Imagine that Eyetalk365 settled. That would not validate the patent. Obviously.
2. Imagine that Alarm Force settled. That settlement agreement would not be binding on CPI.

Have I fairly answered your questions?
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.