InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 45
Posts 2138
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/08/2011

Re: waltczyk post# 9297

Wednesday, 03/25/2015 12:36:20 PM

Wednesday, March 25, 2015 12:36:20 PM

Post# of 9405
lol...that's some good shootin there, Tex


Maybe gear up for some crying because you expressed

some negative views...many soft ears here who may have

coincidentally migrated to VNTH lol.


I agree with the vast majority in principle

not sure about the SS being all fkked up but

I do know a guy could go ahead and handle this

informally or formally in some better way.


One must ask wth the hiring of Soldinger, then

Malone-Bailey accounting firms and so on had as a

purpose here-- everyone just somehow fails

and mistakes are all over the place and so the

"my hands are tied" story rolls out.



There are many people with degrees that are garbage

at an ethical level, regardless of whether

they have decent analytic skills. That dude who was

at a Boston uni and denounced global

warming as really a result of some sun effect

was on the take from major conservative fossil

fuel supporting groups, it turned out.


If true, sad but unsurprising.


Well, we will see. I believe if enough of us

articulate our deep-seated concerns about

possible manipulations of ownership, space-act agreements

originally awarded to MSGI and so forth to the

NASA general counsel office, it would be a good start.

No doubt they've heard the story from a few sources,

but our concerns matter, too. For those who are

unhappy and don't want the hassle of investigating

the merits of a class-action against the people

who've found a way to walk with your investment,

the inquiry at this office may be a reasonable alternative.

http://www.nasa.gov/offices/ogc/about/index.html#.VRLgg47F-Fk

SD

PS If the Space-act agreements are for 5 years, there is time

to voice your concerns, write a letter, etc, all may not be lost,

as the Space-Act agreement is with MSGI, not with "new" companies

and so on. Now is the time to act, and a well-wrought letter

expressing your concerns to the group that still

retains control over tech right distributions etc is a good way to get

this done NOW, before the big money rolls in with the

results from paid trials with Roche, etc. If we believe we're getting

cut out of what we invested in,

consider raising the issue with the office that oversees the regulation

of these tech gotten through Space-Act agreements. They are not the SEC

but they are tax-payer paid gatekeepers that have some responsibility

to assure ethical standards are being met by recipients, including the

treatment of investors like us.

SD

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.