Mmm, I don't think so.
I pointed out possibilities that exist that can be discussed,
and it seems you have problems with people who believe these options
can be discussed, especially if it's not discussed how you believe it
should be. I can be concerned about some kind of trickery going on, and
I have explained why I am concerned. The absolute absurdity of the past
2 weeks is a GREAT starting point. My evidence for concern also
includes data from the SEC. YOURS? From what I've seen, you have
decided that your job is to decide what can be discussed or not, and in
what way. That's so funny I almost spilt my coffee.
However, if you like situations where people can't speak their mind in
informal online forums, CHINA AND RUSSIA are waiting for you, Dane. And
if you think my tone is so rough or inappropriate, I've got some forums
you should never, ever visit, where you will understand how VERY
insignificant you are (like me!).
Seriously, get over yourself, unless you want to offer some info not on
the filing table? I want justice and there are a bunch of reasons to
think that's NOT the way things are going, yet there you are, peddling
a critical view of someone who's been with and supporting this company
for SEVEN years and finally decided that SUBSTANTIAL empirical evidence
about what has transpired MUST be considered. There will be fair
treatment of MSGI investors, whether you're now committed to VNTH alone,
or whatever, or not.
SD
