I never said "everyone" That's your exaggeration, probably for some undisclosed purpose. Did my suggestion of collusion strike too close to home? There's a pretty striking line between those that immediately didn't care about their millions of shares and those that did. I think anyone paying just a little attention would note my main concern about one particular "part" of the company, based on evidence presented by the SEC and stunning opacity for half a decade. Those defending against a critical perspective are far more suspect at this juncture. Maybe that's the story, maybe not. I'm sure everything was just out of hand EXCEPT for the ability to set up in a privately held company in a lower-liability state. My mistake. SD