InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 298
Posts 29914
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 03/06/2012

Re: deafelephant post# 182366

Thursday, 03/05/2015 12:49:27 PM

Thursday, March 05, 2015 12:49:27 PM

Post# of 238037
Read the whole letter, it is because of the way that independent website is marketing them and the label isn't correct for that type of marketing as a cure for specific illnesses. It is not the label in and of itself but rather the marketing it as a cure for specific illnesses.

The FDA is saying that it is being marketed as a drug on that website and not a nutritional product. That is the violation and the labeling isn't sufficient to be marketed as a drug.



This is the key sentence in that letter:

which the website promotes for conditions that cause the products to be drugs under section 201(g)(1)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) [21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1)(B)],



So based on that it is the websites marketing that is causing it to be in violation, not the label or the product itself.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/352


All
posts are only my opinion. Please do your own DD. I am not
professional analyst nor do I play one on TV.