Wednesday, March 04, 2015 1:46:01 PM
I am saying that some sialylation methods that appear applicable to the MNTA IVig program are disclosed in patents that appear to be chiefly concerned with the biosimilar program. I am suggesting that because of that, Baxter has probably already had a closer look than most potential suitors and has passed. I am suggesting they are more interested in a directly competing technology. I am saying that I may not be right about all this, but it would be a good idea for us to look at competing efforts and think about the IP and timing of certain related events.
Am I making myself clear?
Regards, RockRat
Aside to DFRAI re CNAT: seen the name, done no DD, and have no opinion.
FEATURED Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Bulk Sample, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Sep 11, 2024 9:15 AM
One World Products Issues Shareholder Update Letter • OWPC • Sep 11, 2024 7:27 AM
Kona Gold Beverage Inc. Reports $1.225 Million in Revenue and $133,000 Net Profit for the Quarter • KGKG • Sep 10, 2024 1:30 PM