NanoViricides Inc. (NNVC)

[drkazmd65]

when in fact that is the very thing that has to be tested.

And obviously,... it will be tested.

However - to argue in the face of all of the previous animal testing that it is in any way likely that 'Cides are toxic in Beagles, or in Humans,.... when they have been tested at extremely high levels in rodents and have been found to NOT be,...

Well,... is, at most, a rhetorical argument. It is (in fact) intellectually dishonest to expect a significant difference based on the accumulated data in the model organisms.

But it is a fact - that until the data to the contrary is in hand - that it hasn't been proven with any scientific certainty that the Flucide is non-toxic in humans.

Why does this particular brand of pointless argument keep popping up?

They are 'Agnostic' in the sense that they should work the same way in all mammalian circulatory systems with similar chemical conditions, pH, ionic traits, and where their target molecule on the virus is present.

And you are intelligent enough to know that this is what has been meant by the use of the term 'Agnostic'. Don't pretend otherwise.