"I wasn’t able to reach Apple’s attorneys, but I did have a chat with Brad Caldwell, the Dallas-based patent infringement specialist who represented Smartflash. He tells a curious story.
“I think the reason we won,” he says, “is because we focused on the questions that were going to be presented to the jury: Were the patents valid? Did Apple infringe? Was the infringement willful?"
As will REVO's lawyers ask the identical questions, most likely during a jury trail.... 1) Q: Are REVO's patents valid? A: Yes, 2) Q: Did Alarm Force, CPI Security & Live Watch Security infringe? A: Yes, 3) Q: Were the infringements willful? A: Yes.....
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.