InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 171
Posts 4222
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/16/2006

Re: jrf30 post# 40235

Friday, 02/27/2015 11:26:53 PM

Friday, February 27, 2015 11:26:53 PM

Post# of 41960
If the logic of saying since something can't be determined to the exact amount means it is "imaginary", it would also mean that the division is imaginary, since we don't know the exact amount of what will be divided. Not accurate (Nor am I saying it is imaginary.) but the same flawed logic. But the FACT that the partners get 80% of the division BEFORE we get ours is AS FACTUAL as the fact there is a division waiting to be had. And it's not a guess as to what percent the partners get. It's the EXACT amount they get. They get 80% off the top on that first division, since they have received zero back so far (Since the division was not received after the partnerships were sold)

If someone ASKS the board what it would mean to the company if a division is made, I think the facts should be presented to that person. Lord knows I don't want to lead anyone astray, and neither would anyone else here, would they? NO one would try to make someone think we truly get $1MM if the value of the division is $2MM, right? We all want the truth to be out there?? Good. And reality stays the same. London gets their portion BEFORE we count it as ours. The partnerships get their portion BEFORE we count the artifacts as ours. And then past due bills need paid, and I stand by my statement that even AFTER any division that should but may or may not occur happens, we shall have ZERO in PROFITS from the revenue received.

If Wilf even sells the artifacts this time, instead of GIVING them away to people who come visit him and having other disappear for lack of good corporate supervision over what was company owned.

I think my answer is VERY closed to REALITY, and in no way is it "imaginary".