InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 374
Posts 16813
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 03/07/2014

Re: Shiskabill post# 81643

Friday, 02/27/2015 9:18:40 AM

Friday, February 27, 2015 9:18:40 AM

Post# of 92948
Uh, all except that MSFT was PROFITABLE FROM ESSENTIALLY DAY ONE and then went on to one of the greatest company rapid growth rates, rapid rise in pure profitability in all of world biz history. MSFT became a cash printing, rapid growth machine producing a train load of millionaires (including an original early employee like a secretary) and some of the world's wealthiest billionaires the day they went public- still in the record books of world biz history.

ACTC never even had an actual "IPO" because of lack of funds or growth or a product to sell- they used the "back door" poor man's method of trading public- via reverse merging into the TWO MOONS KACHINA DOLL COMPANY of Utah straight on to the OTC market place.

OCAT is nothing of the sorts of an "early Microsoft" - not even a distant remote comparison to the history of MSFT as a business?

http://www.nature.com/news/stem-cell-research-never-say-die-1.9759

The ACTC/OCAT tale is long and sorted and to this day, some 15 plus yrs later has never produced so much as one CENT of ROI to its common shareholders nor has ever produced even one successful salable and profitable product to market and has actually lost about 98% of the value of the common stock shares, had a SEC violation or two along the way including SEC prosecutions including $millions in fines still being paid by the shareholders in final payments to this day, etc.

That is NOT a "Microsoft story" by any stretch or comparison.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.