Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:40:12 PM
It's a good question....but one that's very hard to answer with any precision.
Like ZTE, D-Link is big company with substantial market share that is competing aggressively all over the world in very competitive markets. They are no doubt asking themselves and their attorneys the obvious questions:
-- should we fight this out in court?
-- what will that cost us?
-- will we win in court?
-- what might it cost us if we're wrong?
-- what can we settle for now?
-- will Vringo be more or less desperate to settle if we stall and wait and dig in our heels?
Etc etc etc
It's a a negotiation.
And that is truly an art.
Hopefully Vringo has some way to entice d-Link to settle now rather than later.
After all, if D-Link is licensed and other competitors are not, doesn't that give them an advantage over others in the market? The others will be at risk of Vringo dropping a legal hammer on them while D-Link will be past that hurdle already -- no doubt at some type of "most favored nation status" type pricing.
Clearly the right thing for ALL involved is settlement -- but arriving at the precise terms is tricky and may require legal battles before conclusion.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM