InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 145
Posts 6227
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/04/2007

Re: prof81 post# 70910

Tuesday, 02/24/2015 12:27:19 PM

Tuesday, February 24, 2015 12:27:19 PM

Post# of 92768
'prof81'? they can just as well have done 4 or more R/S'es and they'd still be "Compliant" under the provisions set forth by the "Safe Harbor Act"

This "Legally Endorsed" provision allows Pinksheet companies to "Get Away With" saying whatever they don't mean, to do the complete opposite of what was just stated moments earlier and more!

Yet through it all, they'd all still be compliant under the laws governing the "Safe Harbor Act" which clears their knowingly ill-performances from being classified as "Wrongful Doings"

This is among the reasons why these pinksheet companies are in such great numbers throughout the stock market, where all but an infinitesimal few have ever mount to anything with sinking monies into, they were all for the most part, proven to be very lucrative to the originators beholding them, while yet again, having cost such massive losses (without legal recourse) suffered of those who've put monies into them!

However, only AFPW can break UP out of this monotony!

In understanding the Risks!, I don’t mind losing in stocks that died TRYING, but I DO mind losing in stocks that died LYING!