InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 1450
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/15/2010

Re: johnkenny post# 18697

Tuesday, 02/24/2015 11:10:25 AM

Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:10:25 AM

Post# of 29254
Yeah, Green retracted all previous statements after Akerman basically called BS on the continuous tale of what happened to the emails and supported it with previously conflicting statements asserted by Green on behalf of Tsai.

Tsai has no emails to prove she is owed back salary and should therefore be denied. However, the verdict is still out as to whether or not damages to Viropro have been directly caused by Tsai's actions/ineptitude/deceit (take your pick). I'm not certain how they can put a value on the damages done even if there was a judgement against.

If you go back to one of the original court transcripts, the judeg specifically tells Green to be careful of what her client is telling here as it may not be truthful and therefore putting her at risk (paraphrasing of course but I don't have time to pull the exact line, maybe later I will).

I would expect a motion for judgment to be filed by Akerman shortly given the recent filings.

I'll see if I can find anything on the Montana suit, but it may not be public.

Our usual poster has gone quiet, I wonder if he is coming to the same realization on this suit as you and I seem to have.