InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 225
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/28/2011

Re: Hurricane_Rick post# 68081

Tuesday, 02/24/2015 9:56:04 AM

Tuesday, February 24, 2015 9:56:04 AM

Post# of 80983
Rick, I defer to your knowledge of the securities laws as to what may constitute a violation of US insider trading laws specifically as it applies to Auryn's stated disclosures and their current activities vis a vis disclosure vs. non disclosure, but at first blush, I don't see how failure to disclose their activities would be considered such. Again, I see the correlation, but I don't see the violation.

OK, just as I thought, I missed the full text of the option agreement. Kudos to the BOD and thank you for reminding me.

Why does there have to be a catch? I know MDMN shareholders have a deep-seeded persecution complex based on past disappointments, so it is probably difficult to trust anything from anyone. However, to date, Auryn has delivered on every intended public goal, and then some. This is what it is like to have a company actually execute in a professional and upfront manner.



I have no beef at Auryn's transparency. I am little surprised that you would even ask that question Why does there have to be a catch?. "persecution complex?". Surely you jest. After all the years of Medinah's clear as mud BS talk and no action.

Auryn is now the answer to many years of frustration and disappointment that the shareholder has had to endure. Let's see if the property lives up to the the perception that has been promulgated by experts and scammers alike. The jury is still out on the full extent of the value of these claims. If it does not prove up as deep and strong as all the talk, then the common shareholder is screwed anyway. I guess we'll find out this year, as "next week" has long come and gone.

Thanks for taking the time to reply. Much appreciated.