InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 496
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/10/2013

Re: basssque post# 24453

Saturday, 02/07/2015 9:55:23 PM

Saturday, February 07, 2015 9:55:23 PM

Post# of 28181
No, actually it is NOT that they are behind on their goals by a few months. They have been making representations, promises and flat out statements for at least 7 or 8 years that are unproven and, according to reputable experts (such a number of mechanical engineers), are wildly overoptimistic and unachievable. When your product is built on the premise that you are routinely achieving the unobtainable, it isn't simply being "behind schedule". Let's take a "for instance". One of the central concepts behind Cyclone is that the use of supercritical steam pressures results in superior economy. PROVEN economy since they have been claiming dyno tests for years despite the fact that their acquisition of a dynamometer was long after their initial claims. If they did the testing out-of-house, they have never managed to produce a printout from a reputable firm. The following discussion examines exactly why their claims are not believed, please note that some of the participants are mechanical engineers:

http://www.steamautomobile.com/ForuM/read.php?1,23394

Rather than digging up volumes of supporting information and links, I suggest you actually read these archives and those on the Yahoo site. It's unbecoming to make allegations and then demand others do your due diligence.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.