Simply Politics & News

[fuagf]

Long2Retire, What?? You say "The Journal Sentinel of Milwaukee has never been a fan of Walker." Well, I had no idea so what else but check, eh .. ok ..

Walker received the endorsements of Wisconsin Right to Life and The Milwaukee Sentinel, which called him a fiscal conservative and noted his pro-life, tough-on-crime, and pro-welfare reform positions. [20]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Walker_%28politician%29#Wisconsin_State_Assembly

some say you can never trust Wikipedia. I disagree and believe it's like most all such references/factcheckers/whatever. Even the Encyclopedia Britannica, i remember, made mistakes. And Wikipedia give heaps of references as you know .. the [20] one here from The Milwaukee Sentinel .. http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=441QAAAAIBAJ&sjid=_xIEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5659,6681887&dq=scott-walker&hl=en .. clearly shows they endorsed Scott Walker from the beginning, which makes your statement a Pants on Fire.

OOPS?? OUCH! Huge wrong opening statement of yours there. Where did you get that idea from? Imagination?

You could now claim (but shucks now i couldn't trust you) the Sentinel's position on Walker had changed. I have no idea on that though this one

Wisconsin DNR under Scott Walker gets mixed reviews
By Lee Bergquist and Thomas Content of the Journal Sentinel Sept. 16, 201
http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/wisconsin-dnr-under-scott-walker-gets-mixed-reviews-b99348906z1-275348611.html

re Walker's pro-business vs concern for the environment (so for the health and safety of all) does not read anti-Walker.

Do you know if they have changed their position on Walker?