EP Global Communications Inc fka EPGL

[Quindien]

Let me explain , that only helps share holders if they are bought out which they stated they don't plan on having happen , yes if they sell the company for 5 million and there are 4.5 billion shares instead of 5 billion it makes a slight difference, but they said they are interested in having this company grow , if they planned on a buyout it would make more sense for them to keep all of their shares because it would be more money for them, they arent giving away free money, they are doing it to make shares higher and it appear to be free but once the pps rise doesn't happen they will decide that the retirnment of shares is done, it's an illusion. If they have 10 shares worth a dollar and say we are giving away 5 shares to help raise your equity what they are really saying is we hope the pps will be 2 dollars, which is the same thing as before in stead of having 10 shares worth 10 dollars they have 5 shares worth 10 dollars because pps went up, but to people it looks as if they are making some huge sacrifice, why do you think they are doing small incriminate???? It's because it's a risk for them because if the pps doesn't reflect the small share reduction they are taking a loss but if it does have pps go up (for some strange reason) then they will continue to reduce. Of course they would rather have 1 billion shares worth 10 dollars over 5 billion agree worth .001, so that leaves us with pps which will not be affected by retiring shares that were never available for trade anyway. It's pretty simple to understand. 10 shares worth $10 is th e same as 5 shares worth $2 unless the pps doesn't change because of th e reduction, if they did retire 2 billion shares at once and the pps didn't move which it wouldn't have then they really would have given up money, but if it did move in accordance with that retirnment th en it would have been worth it, they weren't sure it would so they decided to reduce small amounts and give themselves an out saying "oh pwc decided that they no longer want to reduce anymore" don't believe for one second that they are retiring shares for their shareholder..........smoke and mirrors.......think about it!!! Attack me or my credibility or inherited shares all you want bit after you're done doing that just think about what I've said.

That is wrong. Let's make this simple. There are 50 shares worth $1/share. 22.5 are MHs and 22.5 are PWC. 5 are the float. To double each share PWC and MH must retire 12.5 each. That means they are retiring MORE than half of their shares to double the vale of each share. They lose money in the immediate future.

So after retiring shares they go from $22.5 with 22.5 shares down to $20 with 10 shares at $2/share. They just lost 10% of their money.