InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,722.26
(
-0.19%
)
US TECH 100
19,432.80
(
0.00%
)
Dow Jones
41,914.75
(
-0.70%
)
Brent Oil
71.06
(
-2.92%
)
Bitcoin
63,768.19
(
1.01%
)
Post# of 18904
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

russo123

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 23
Posts 3591
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/28/2010

russo123

Re: itsawinner post# 13350

Thursday, 01/29/2015 2:00:18 PM

Thursday, January 29, 2015 2:00:18 PM

Post# of 18904
Please tell me we aren't going back to this nonsense again. Berry got a million shares so his opinions are biased at best. He stated an opinion without any SEC approved data or anything reaching 43-101 compliant levels. So at worst his opinions are unprofessional.

USPR in their most recent 10Q said "none of our mineralized material met the definition of proven or probable reserves."

Why don't we stick with facts here for a change.

This post is my opinion and should not be used as investment advice.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up