Alliance Creative Group Inc (ACGX)

[1~Eye~Jack!!]

~ ACGX = LMFAO!!! WOW POS!..=..000's..Coming..&..Fast!

Dear-Shareholder,
Quote:
As-per our-disclosures and-interviews as-the CEO of ACGX Steve has never sold a single share of common stock and the purpose of the preferred shares are not to convert and get more common shares but to always have enough votes to avoid losing control until he is ready to. One way to phrase it is a poison pill.

I do have 1 question that I would be very interested in hearing multiple
people¹s opinion on and that is if you had to pick between increasing the
authorized shares of the common shares and the amendment of the voting
rights of the preferred or a reverse stock split which would you prefer?

So for example if a company had 700 mil common shares and 4 mil pref with
200 to 1 voting or 800 mil votes which is better for the shareholders:
1. Increase the common to 1 bil or 1.5 bil and amend the pref to 300 to 1
or 400 to 1 voting
Or
2. Reverse the 700 mil common by 10 to 1 or 50 to 1 to reduce it to 70
mil or 14 mil common shares and if the stock were at .002 before the
reverse it would then be at .02 or .10 per share after.

Let me know your opinion and what others think as well.
Thanks
Paul

Quote:
I appreciate your feedback

We haven’t changed the opinions that we have stated publicly multiple
times.
I was just explaining the options that officers of a company have to
evaluate and compare when making any decisions.
Everyone jumps to conclusions when we make any statements about anything.

We have not made any decisions and we have not changed any of our opinions
and if and when we decide on doing anything we will disclose that info to
the public all at the same time as per the proper disclosure rules.

PauL


Quote:
Paul Sorkin
10:57 AM (1 hour ago)

I would hope that people would start to understand that in all businesses there are difficult choices to be made all the time and we could have legally issued billions of shares non-stop to allow the debt holders to get their money back while crushing the stock and although we did issue some shares it could have been much much worse if we didn’t care about the shareholders.