InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 46
Posts 2384
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 04/30/2014

Re: Logicworks post# 44349

Tuesday, 01/27/2015 12:43:33 AM

Tuesday, January 27, 2015 12:43:33 AM

Post# of 57991
So the data wouldn't be from past transactions linked to the address?

Asking again because MELY had 100 (1 T/H) servers running on btcpoolparty.com since August and then didn't transfer those servers over to Ghash until after they took them off btcpoolparty.com which was 17 Dec 2014.

So if they transferred them onto another mining site would the blockchain show the total amount received for that address and the start date is just when that address started receiving from the ghash mining site? The "Big Increase" only being the fact that, that address has already had transactions linked to it from August and it just looks like a lot because they transferred onto a new mining site and the information is from when the address was uploaded from that mining site?

Would it even be possible for that number of BTC to be mined/received since August with that hash rate and a possible upgrade in hash rate if they have received any of the servers from spoondoolie? (The worker currently running on btcpoolparty is running at a spoondoolie hash rate.)

Just trying to clarify here.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.