InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 18
Posts 211
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/29/2012

Re: jcoukr post# 278115

Sunday, 01/25/2015 2:09:52 PM

Sunday, January 25, 2015 2:09:52 PM

Post# of 312015
I think Johns fault wads mostly being a mad scientist type with zero ability to run a company or work well with others. That is not uncommon. Imo he didn't intend to fleece shareholders l. He spent ridiculous time developing these machines whether they end up being profitable or not he did not go thru all that'll to sell shares. Think about what a pain in the are getting all the permits etc alone was. Did he exaggerate and "lie" on some stuff? Ya everybody does. I'm sure he wanted to profit from this also, who wouldnt. But I don't think his goal was to scam. I've seen the machines they are impressive and it's been verified by several reputable parties. I'm not happy believe me I'm down huge. But I'm just trying to keep it real. I don't defend John on everything he's a dreamer and probly a little crazy and his mismanagement Is partly to blame. just no point spewing hate and blame now, let's just hope they get these going and can show proof of concept. These things always take way longer than expected and there reckless management almost ruined everthing. Conspiracies aside, I don't know anything about that stuff. remember , just cause it hasn't worked doesn't mean it cant. It takes a lot things to line up to be successfull. Tons of variables and nothing ever goes as planned if with a good plan which jbi didn't have. I will say I've witnessed it first hand when they were running Crayola it was awesome. I can't believe they haven't made a deal there but maybe they needed proof of scalability or something g who knows. It's not just prylosis that's been proven. I still see potential if they can run for an extent ed period. There are many options with feedstock once this is proven. Some buyers may not even require profitability just that it works to reduce waste supply etc. Just muly thoughts let's hope for the best it all we got