Friday, January 23, 2015 8:02:20 PM
---Do you consider obviousness of the Lang
patents a purely
legal question (so unaffected by the TEVA decision) or
was it underpinned by factual determinations (due to testimony
by expert witnesses) and therefore covered by the TEVA decision?
------
I am no lawyer but I think the obviousness question has been dealt with at the district court level, so it falls totally under the TEVA ruling.
Now what I don't know about is the 101 ruling, which has been done after Vringo won the at the district court. So IF ANY problem should occur, it would be about that 101 thingy.
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM
Moon Equity Holdings, Corp. Announces Acquisition of Wikolo, Inc. • MONI • May 7, 2024 9:48 AM