Friday, January 23, 2015 8:02:20 PM
---Do you consider obviousness of the Lang
patents a purely
legal question (so unaffected by the TEVA decision) or
was it underpinned by factual determinations (due to testimony
by expert witnesses) and therefore covered by the TEVA decision?
------
I am no lawyer but I think the obviousness question has been dealt with at the district court level, so it falls totally under the TEVA ruling.
Now what I don't know about is the 101 ruling, which has been done after Vringo won the at the district court. So IF ANY problem should occur, it would be about that 101 thingy.
North Bay Resources Commences Operations at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California; Engages Sabean Group Management Consulting • NBRI • Sep 25, 2024 9:15 AM
CEO David B. Dorwart Anticipates a Bright Future at Good Gaming Inc. Through His Most Recent Shareholder Update • GMER • Sep 25, 2024 8:30 AM
Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. Advance Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology - Dr. Bruce Goldberger to Present at Society of Forensic Toxicologists Conference • BLOZF • Sep 24, 2024 8:50 AM
Integrated Ventures, Inc Announces Strategic Partnership For GLP-1 (Semaglutide) Procurement Through MedWell USA, LLC. • INTV • Sep 24, 2024 8:45 AM
Avant Technologies Accelerates Creation of AI-Powered Platform to Revolutionize Patient Care • AVAI • Sep 24, 2024 8:00 AM
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM