InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 5692
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/18/2001

Re: T-Do post# 11318

Friday, 01/23/2015 10:09:58 AM

Friday, January 23, 2015 10:09:58 AM

Post# of 39360
My only perspective is (a) if this was such a good idea and plan the stock would be reflecting that, and (b) investments should be made on management.

My son is in private equity in NY for almost 20 years. 80% of his decision to buy is management. Either its good and you keep it or bad and you replace them if the business model is in tact.

We have a management that has several crooks and has shown that they are only interested in self-enrichment. Why aren't they working for $1 each while we have no profits? Why not simply take options? Why do they charge rent for Adessky's law offices? Why did people who provide loans get nothing but Renken got 9 million shares for his loan?

What experience does Addessky or Renken have to run a company - Adessky is not even a good lawyer based upon how he has conducted himself.

MANAGEMENT DOES NOT CARE ABOUT YOU!!!! You are road-kill. Collateral damage.

When I ran the development stage company I treated shareholders properly. As an example, I flew first class but paid the upgrade with my money because I felt shareholders should not pay for first class until I performed.

Look at the accrued expenses in our company. THOSE WILL ALL GO TO THE MANAGEMENT if this company ever generates any cash. Why not write it off as a sign of good faith?