Tuesday, January 20, 2015 11:40:10 AM
Supremes response:
Per Justice Breyer: the Federal Circuit's decision is vacated and remanded. - See more at: live.scotusblog.com/Event/Live_blog_of_orders_and_opinions__January_20_2014#sthash.UDgjrbR4.dpuf
When reviewing a district court’s resolution of subsidiary factual
matters made in the course of its construction of a patent claim, the
Federal Circuit must apply a “clear error,” not a de novo, standard of review. Pp. 4–16.
(a)
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a)(6) states that a court of
appeals “must not . . . set aside” a district court’s “[f]indings of fact” unless they are “clearly erroneous
This is very good for VRNG - light at the end of the tunnel that the supremes will make the same conclusion for us and send it back to the CAFC.
They slapped the CAFC pretty good on this one.
FEATURED Cannabix Technologies Launches New Compact Breath Logix Workplace Series and Prepares for Delivery to South Africa • May 7, 2024 8:51 AM
Moon Equity Holdings, Corp. Announces Acquisition of Wikolo, Inc. • MONI • May 7, 2024 9:48 AM
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM