InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 3804
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/07/2002

Re: DewDiligence post# 12949

Tuesday, 01/20/2015 11:31:54 AM

Tuesday, January 20, 2015 11:31:54 AM

Post# of 20689
Thanks. From Scotus blog - the last portion of the opinion is pasted below. I wonder how this will impact the challenge of the 40 mg patent.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>
When the Federal Circuit reviewed the District Court’s
decision, it recognized that the peak of the curve did not
match the 7.7 kilodaltons listed in the legend of figure 1.
723 F. 3d, at 1369. But the Federal Circuit did not accept
Teva’s expert’s explanation as to how a skilled artisan
would expect the peaks of the curves to shift. And it failed
to accept that explanation without finding that the District
Court’s contrary determination was “clearly erroneous.”
See ibid. The Federal Circuit should have accepted
the District Court’s finding unless it was “clearly erroneous.”
Our holding today makes clear that, in failing to do
so, the Federal Circuit was wrong.
Teva claims that there are two additional instances in
which the Federal Circuit rejected the District Court’s
factual findings without concluding that they were clearly
erroneous. We leave these matters for the Federal Circuit
to consider on remand in light of today’s opinion.
We vacate the Federal Circuit’s judgment, and we remand
the case for further proceedings consistent with this
opinion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>