From the actual court records ...
They had no Conditional Use Permit, no licenses, and no insurance.
That sounds just like what good ol' TED has been saying for several YEARS.
********************
The appeal involves depreciation for solar thermal lenses that are allegedly in Utah; the manufacturer/seller is in Utah. The portions of Defendant’s Exhibit E referenced by Defendant during trial concerned the lack of a local conditional land use permit and other required permits, licenses, and insurance for the manufacturing of thermal solar lenses, stainless steel turbines, heat exchangers, and circuit boards in 2011 (and before), and the eventual approval of a conditional use permit by Millard County (Utah) in April 2014. Gregg’s objection was based on Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 6, which is a letter signed by the three Millard County Commissioners dated February 12, 2014, expressing enthusiasm for the solar lens project in Millard County, Utah. Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 6 does not conflict with Defendant’s Exhibit E, and the court therefore admitted Exhibit E over Gregg’s objection.
Sure is a pretty day.
TED