InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 1001
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/09/2006

Re: ccraider post# 21042

Friday, 01/16/2015 12:08:45 PM

Friday, January 16, 2015 12:08:45 PM

Post# of 23258
Hi..!! ccraider

Your post posits the MOST reasonable explanation of this VERY
convoluted and conflicted quandary, that I have seen..

For some yet undisclosed reason the only post by Patriot on the
subject, does NOT mention a License purchase by HTC..

http://patriotscientific.com/patriot-settles-litigation-with-htc-corporation-01082015.html


While the post by Alliacense contains the news that a License was
purchased by HTC..

http://www.alliacense.com/announcements/

So that leads to some confusion as to WHY this is SO.

Additionally!! I have been checking the Alliacense site several times each day and the,--License--purchase appeared on the 15th,
and NOT before..(Was, Leckrone's 'OK' was needed), the reason for the delay by Alliacense)..

AND,, why did Patriot announce a settlement was reached,
'BUT' did NOT include that a License was purchased in their post...

And finally.. Was there TWO separate PAYMENTS to PDS?

ONE the jury award and ONE the License FEE?





Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CPMV News